Automated Predeployment Testing of Windows Applications

MCM vs. Intune: Debunking the Biggest Myths

Written by Ricky Patel | Mar 21, 2025 8:03:54 PM

As organizations modernize their IT infrastructure, the conversations around Microsoft Configuration Manager (MCM), formerly known as SCCM, and Microsoft Intune often leads to misconceptions. IT administrators often wonder: Should we switch entirely to Intune? Is MCM becoming obsolete? Will moving to the cloud reduce security?

This blog aims to debunk common myths surrounding MCM and Intune, clarifying their differences, capabilities, and how organizations can leverage them effectively.

In this article, we explore the pitfalls of traditional reactive migration methods, delve into the technical benefits of a proactive approach, and explain how automated tools can help identify and remediate problematic applications early. By understanding these factors, IT leaders can better prepare for a seamless Windows 11 migration that not only avoids the pitfalls of extended support fees and security vulnerabilities but also supports continuous digital transformation.

Unified Management with Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Microsoft Endpoint Manager combines the power of MCM and Intune into a single management platform. This unified solution enables organizations to:

  • Implement Co-Management: Manage devices using both on-premises MCM and cloud-based Intune, allowing a smooth transition to a cloud-first strategy.

  • Deliver Hybrid Patch Management: Leverage on-premises patch management through WSUS/Software Update Points while also utilizing Windows Update for Business in cloud-enabled environments.

  • Optimize Security Posture: Use Conditional Access, Microsoft Defender integration, and role-based access control (RBAC) across all managed endpoints.

Quick Comparison Table: MCM vs. Intune

 

MCM

Intune

Deployment Model

On-premises with potential for hybrid integration

Cloud-native, optimized for remote and hybrid setups

Device Support

Primarily Windows-focused (extended with integrations)

Supports Windows, macOS, iOS, Android

Application Management

Package-based deployments with deep local control

Cloud app deployment, modern MDM/MAM policies

Patch Management

WSUS and Software Update Points for on-prem devices

Windows Update for Business with cloud-delivered updates

Security & Compliance

Deep, on-prem security policies with extensive customization

Cloud-driven Conditional Access, integrated with Microsoft Defender and Microsoft Entra ID

Remote Work Support

Requires VPN or hybrid setups for remote management

Fully cloud-enabled management for remote workforce

Myth 1: MCM and Intune serve the same purpose

Reality: MCM is best for managing Windows devices in an on-prem environment with granular software and patch control. In contrast, Intune is designed for cloud-based, modern management and supports a diverse range of devices using MDM-based configuration profiles, including mobile and macOS. Integrated under Microsoft Endpoint Manager, these solutions are complementary — offering co-management capabilities that empower organizations to transition to cloud-first strategies while maintaining on-prem control where needed. 

Myth 2: Intune cannot manage traditional desktops

Reality: Intune fully supports Windows device management, including group policies, software deployment, and compliance controls. With features like Windows Autopilot for streamlined deployments and robust compliance settings, Intune effectively manages traditional desktops and laptops alongside mobile devices; and its cloud-based patch management capabilities ensure that devices receive updates without needing VPN or on-prem infrastructure.

Myth 3: Migrating from MCM to Intune means losing control

Reality: Migrating to a cloud-first management approach with Intune does not mean sacrificing control. Instead, administrators benefit from setting their own security policies, leveraging Conditional Access to ensure only compliant devices access corporate resources, and a flexible management framework that enforces compliance remotely. While MCM still offers deep, granular configurations for environments that require on-prem control, Intune provides better flexibility in modern IT environments. Using co-management, organizations can gradually shift workloads to Intune without compromising on control or security.

Myth 4: Transitioning to Intune is disruptive & complex

Reality: A phased, co-managed approach minimizes disruption, and allows IT admins to transition specific workloads over time. Organizations can start with pilot deployments, manage a subset of devices through Intune, and gradually transition workloads based on criticality. Rimo3 provides migration tools to enable seamless transition at scale, ensuring that IT teams maintain continuous operational control while modernizing their endpoint management environments. For more information, check out the newly improved Rimo3 platform.

Myth 5: Intune Is not suitable for large enterprises

Reality: Intune is highly scalable and well-suited for large enterprises. It offers robust role-based access control (RBAC), comprehensive reporting, and integrations with SIEM and compliance tools. Whether managing a few dozen or thousands of devices globally, Intune delivers the performance and reliability required by large organizations.

Myth 6: Cloud-based management is less secure than on-premises solutions

Reality: Intune leverages cloud-based security enhancements such as Conditional Access policies that enforce device compliance before access is granted. Integrated with Microsoft Defender and Microsoft Entra ID, Intune provides a robust security framework that protects endpoints — regardless of their location. This modern approach to security is designed to protect remote workers and adapt to evolving threat landscapes.

Myth 8: MCM is being phased out

Reality: MCM remains a critical component of the unified Microsoft Endpoint Manager solution for organizations that need deep on-premises control. Hybrid environments benefit from leveraging both MCM and Intune, ensuring that the right tool is used for the right scenario based on organizational needs, compliance requirements, and IT strategy.

Conclusion

Moving from MCM to Intune doesn’t mean losing control — it means gaining flexibility, security, and modern endpoint management capabilities. By debunking these myths, we see that:

  • MCM and Intune serve different purposes but can work together in a hybrid model.
  • Intune provides scalability, flexibility, and cloud-based management, while MCM offers deep, on-prem control.
  • IT teams should evaluate security, compliance, and user needs to determine the best management approach.